I was told so many times a photo is just that, a photo, even if it was taken with a mobile phone. Less and less of the general population see any difference. So, here is a combination of the mobile phone camera and Adobe Lightroom application. Bloody oath[1] it looks terrible to me …

The question is: How would you feel, if your professional portrait photographer used a mobile phone during a session with you?

Eventually I will sell all my modern cameras but the one I have from last century, my beloved Nikon F5, no, stop asking me – this one I will never sell. :-)


  1. yes / true; Australian Slang. “Bloody oath mate, that is so true.” ↩︎

28 responses to “Bus Ride with iPhone”

  1. I think the question almost can’t be answered. Personally I chide myself for not just ditching most of my cameras and going with pinhole cameras only. But that’s just me.
    I do highly recommend reading Brooks Jensen’s book “Letting go of the Camera” on the subject.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank Christian for the book recommendation here it is – “Letting go of the Camera” by Brooks Jensen and here is Kindle Edition

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Ya, I am just rereading the Kindle edition.
        Had a hard copy years ago, but can’t find it!🤪

        Liked by 1 person

  2. you had a lot of engagement here.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Yes, I am a very lucky, lucky, lucky photography person!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I have a bit of quiet time and thought I’d get started.

    Before I tackle the issues raised I feel that I ought to discuss the history of my involvement with photography. At no time have I been a commercial photographer.
    I received my first camera when I was a young teenager in the early ‘50’s. It was an Agfa Box camera. My photography heroes were, and still are, W. Eugene Smith and David Douglas Duncan. Although reporters and journalists often/mostly used cameras like the Speed Graphic, Smith and Duncan used Leicas and the new Japanese 35mm rangefinder and SLR cameras.
    On my high school yearbook staff we were given Speed Graphics. My Uncle had given me a Contaflex SLR, and I tried to sneak that in on the assignments I was given, my results weren’t particularly impressive. For one thing, I kept insisting on ‘pushing’ my film, Kodak Tri-X, too much.
    I didn’t really settle down and produce useable work till the early 1980’s when I started freelance writing and photographing for sailing magazines.
    While I had started developing and printing my own film when on the high school yearbook staff, I didn’t have my own darkroom till decades later, and took my film to commercial labs.
    My cameras were Fuji FX-3’s, relatively cheap, and most importantly, they took Zeiss lenses.
    In the 1980’s my wife decided to go to grad school, and I followed her to university and was able to be allowed to take photo courses offered by the Art Department, with full access to the darkroom facilities. When my wife received her degree, we went back home and I had learned enough to build my own darkroom.
    We lived in a very small Gulf island community on Florida’s west coast. Commercial fishing, crabbing and oystering were the traditional occupations in town.
    I was too reticent to approach the gruff looking local fisherman for permission to photography them, but the place was interesting enough to make me push myself to start photographing. Gradually I realized that a well printed black and white photo had great appeal among the local population and was a respected item.
    This is a point that is basically lost today and is a reason why photography isn’t what it used to be, and in my opinion never will be again, because ever changing developments in technology keep shifting the ‘value’ an image possesses.
    I will leave it at this for now and hope to continue, after the storm passes, if we are fortunate enough to make it through it safely.

    Best, Chris to

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Looks like we may get hit pretty hard by the hurricane tomorrow night.
    Fingers crossed, but it may be a while till I will be able to respond.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. No problem, thank you, and more importantly stay safe!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I launched a reply a few minutes ago but have no idea where it went, hopefully it will appear somewhere! 🤪

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I do agree that there seems to be a renewed interest in film photography, but I don’t see it having a significant impact on the broader field of photography.
    One of my friends, who is a retired photo professor with a Guggenheim to his credit, still shoots exclusively on film. We’ve had many discussions about this, and while he remains passionate about film, we both believe that it won’t see a true resurgence. His colleagues, who teach photography at universities across the country, share this sentiment. There just aren’t enough students dedicated to sustaining the teaching of film photography in the long term.

    Moreover, I think one of the major pillars that once supported photography, such as magazines and newspapers, are largely gone and unlikely to make a comeback. This shift has undeniably impacted the field of photojournalism as well.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, I agree, you hit the problem on the head, time changes things in odd ways. I typed “Photojournalism” into DuckDuckGo and I got “Content Creators” jobs. One interesting description was from News Corp Australia – “Shoot Producer and Picture Editor” what a bloody pathetic naming style.

      I feel that any and all photography academia, professionals, hobbyists, amateurs and possibly interested camera brands should get together and start some sort of movement, where the “major pillars” as you put it, will have a problem with usage rights of any and all photography and videography. They should no longer have access to “The Art of Photography” that brought them to where they are now and make them stay “satisfied” with “photo is just that, a photo” concept for their publications, news channels imprint and online.

      But, there are possibly problems within the photographic community as well that needs to be looked at. Would you agree? Do you see any?

      Liked by 1 person

  7. I like the photos, but a pro photographer must use a proper camera for a portrait photo.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Ow yes! Abso-bloody-lutely (OZ jargon) I completely agree with you John. … and some good studio lighting – access to natural and good strobe light as well.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Agreed! I just realised that you are in Australia, oops. 😬

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Absolutely no problems at all John. I am Russian (by my Mom), French (by my Dad), Russian/German (by my Grandad) and Russian/יְהוּדֵי אַשְׁכְּנַז (by my Grandma) So, you see I am Australian. :-) oops.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Wow, that’s an amazing family tree, Sergei! 👍🏻😎

            Liked by 1 person

              1. No, you are NOT! Talk positive about yourself! 👍🏻

                Liked by 1 person

  8. Wow, I think my answer, if it truly expressed my thoughts on that, would be book length.
    I will try and write down some of my thoughts and pass them on to you later.🤪

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thank you Christian. I will very patiently await the completion of your book! Can I please get it autographed, when you finish it? :-) But seriously, photographers with your ability, experience and eloquence should write these books. If it’s not you, whom then?

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Well, looks like we have a storm coming up the Gulf right for us, so it will probably be a bit before I can form a coherent sentence!🤪

        Liked by 1 person

        1. … not good. What is its name?

          Liked by 1 person

  9. It’s definitely a generational thing it seems to me. It may be why so many of the younger folks are into film photography, they already have a digital camera in their pocket, and access to software that will edit it anyway they please. I am the same about my OM1.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Yes, I do see film photography “rebirth” I hope that it’s more than just a fashionable thing to do. Just as I hope that there will be a “rebirth” of the photojournalism …

      Like

  10. Regarding the saying “a photo is just a photo,” I don’t think that’s entirely accurate. It depends a lot on the purpose and the subject of the image.

    In this case, the phone bus ride photos, meant for web publication, are more about the story they tell than about the technical quality of the photos.

    That being said, they are well-edited and come across beautifully. Sometimes, photographers can be too critical of each other, and we also tend to doubt ourselves too much, wondering if something is “good enough.”

    Have a great day!

    Marc

    Liked by 4 people

    1. I hate that phrase myself, it’s just what I hear too often. But yes, I agree with you Marc, completely. And thank you for being supportive, I really appreciate it!

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to John Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.